Strong signal

How should we interpret the decision of the Office of the Ombudsman to dismiss Makati Mayor Jejomar Erwin "Junjun" Binay Jr. for his alleged involvement in the anomalous Makati carpark building project worth P2.28 billion?

On its face, it sends a strong message to other public officials that they must adhere to the highest standards of transparency and accountability while holding public office. 

The Ombudsman dismissed Binay effective immediately for "grave misconduct and dishonesty." This pertains only to the administrative aspect of the case. The criminal aspect will still have to undergo trial at the Sandiganbayan.

It is important to note that the Office of the Ombudsman also dismissed Masbate Gov. Rizalina Lañete in connection with her alleged  anomalous utilization of Priority Development Assistance Funds amounting to P112.29 million as a House representative from 2007 to 2009.

So it cannnot be said that the Ombudsman's ruling is highly selective and even partisan. 

On the other hand, the political opposition can also claim  that the timing of the Ombudsman's ruling is suspect as the case against the young Binay would have an adverse impact on VP Binay's presidential bid.

Be that as it may, the Constitution is very clear: "Public office is a public trust. Public officers and employees must at all times be accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty and efficiency, patriotism and justice, and lead modest lives."

No public officer one therefore therefore claim immunity from suit when graft and corruption is concerned.

Image by www.spot.ph