Miyerkules, Mayo 6, 2015

Zero credibility

Hilario Davide, Jr., and not Renato Corona, should have been the first chief justice of the Supreme Court (SC) to be impeached, thus San Beda Graduate School of Law dean Fr. Ranhilio Aquino was too charitable in his characterization of Davide in his May 4 column.

In that piece, Aquino admitted though that Davide and his fellow members of the Citizens’ Peace Council (CPC) were Malacañang's “conscripted allies”. thus their recommendation to Congress to pass the BBL was to be expected and should be scrutinized thoroughly.

To call a spade a spade, Davide is a Malacanñang rah-rah boy for the BBL and his being a former chief justice does not imbue with any legal weight the views he expressed last week on the BBL before the House, where he displayed an air of legal expertise that was too contrived to be believed.

Davide has lost any and all claim to credibility when he escaped impeachment in 2003 by the skin of his teeth over his highly questionable use of hundreds of millions of pesos of the Judiciary Development Fund (JDF). Remember Davide’s kurtina (curtains) scandal?

The murmurs then were that two lady presidents  had to work behind the scenes to massage members of congress into not impeaching Davide. However, that endeavor failed when 86 members of the House still voted to transmit the articles of impeachment against Davide to the Senate.

What happened next was Davide’s own SC saved him from ruin by declaring the impeachment complaint as unconstitutional on a mere technicality – on it being the second such complaint filed against Davide within the same year.

And now, Davide wants the people to believe that he has the credibility to push the BBL? What Davide  doesn’t realize is that he is already damaged goods, and that his pretensions as a former CJ are clear for everyone to see. 

The BBL is a thinly concealed attempt to carve a Muslim sub-state from Mindanao as a precursor to secession.  Davide cannot tell us otherwise.  -end-



Martes, Mayo 5, 2015

Where are the figures?

Either acting Commission on Elections (Comelec) chairman Christian Lim does not have the actual figures to support his claim that vote-buying incidents increased in 2013, or he’s more into giving knee-jerk generalizations.  Over the weekend, Lim claimed that because politicians were at their wits’ ends on how to tamper with the results of automated elections, they resorted to more vote-buying in the 2013 polls.

That’s a logical conclusion for any Tom, Dick and Harry to make, but for someone who was just named acting chief of the Comelec, I expected Lim to have done his homework first  before making this pronouncement to media. He should have come up with comparative  figures on the incidents of vote-buying during the last manual election  and the succeeding automated polls.

At the very least, Lim could have cited a number of government officials elected in 2013 whose seats were forfeited on account of over-spending and whose forfeiture, at least in one instance, was upheld by a ruling of the Supreme Court.  If not anipso facto proof of vote-buying, overspending by an electoral candidate suggests he or she was ready and willing to get any advantage over a rival by any means possible.

I, likewise, do not subscribe to the view that the passing of a “money ban” law prohibiting the withdrawal of P100,000 per day and the transport of over P500,000 in a span of six days before election day could put into effect a similar ban shot down by the SC in the May 2013 mid-term polls. Such a law, I think, would be declared unconstitutional because it would run counter to many provisions of our organic law that gives our people the freedom to trade goods and do commerce.

Since when did economic activities grind to a halt or slow down on account of the elections? The Comelec must be more creative in going after election cheats than reviving or floating the revival of silly notions like that of a money ban.


                                      -end-



Image by The Guardian                                                                          

Sabado, Mayo 2, 2015

‘Terima kasih,’ Indonesia


Indonesian President Joko Widodo went out on a limb for the Philippines when he ordered a last-minute stay on the execution of Mary Jane Veloso.

It was the first time Widodo granted a reprieve to a convicted drug dealer since he assumed office last year and launched the campaign to stop drug trafficking in his country. The reason he cited to justify the reprieve—to enable Veloso to testify against drug rings operating in Indonesia—does not, strictly speaking, constitute newly found evidence that would warrant such action.

It probably helped that President Aquino talked to Indonesia’s foreign minister, a woman, about this and she passed on the idea to Widodo before Veloso could be tied to the firing stake.

Although Veloso’s death sentence has not been lifted, Widodo did the Philippines a favor when he gave her an indefinite lease on life.

Earlier, he rejected the appeals of Australia and Brazil to grant clemency to their citizens who, like Veloso, have been convicted for drug trafficking.

If the investigation that Veloso is set to get involved in shows she was an unwitting victim of a drug ring, or information vital to Indonesia’s anti-drug-trafficking campaign is discovered, Widodo may be persuaded to reduce her sentence to life imprisonment.

In the days after Veloso’s execution was put on hold, I scanned The Jakarta Post, the most widely read English-language newspaper in Indonesia, to find out the Indonesians’ reaction to their president’s unprecedented move.

The commentaries and letters to the editor in the broadsheet did not express strong adverse reaction to the reprieve despite the fact that an Indonesian was also executed on the day Veloso was supposed to suffer the same fate.

The Indonesian people probably empathize with Veloso because many Indonesian women, like Filipino women, work as domestic helpers in different parts of the world.

The liberal treatment Widodo extended to Veloso did not come to me as a surprise. The friendship between the Philippines and Indonesia stands on a high level. On several occasions, Indonesia assisted the Philippines in its advocacies in Asean.

On a personal note, I have noticed an almost spontaneous camaraderie between Filipinos and Indonesians in regional and international business conferences. This rapport may be attributed to our common Malay stock, and the similarity in political and social problems that our countries have gone through. It also helps that certain words in Bahasa, the Indonesian language, and Filipino have the same meaning.

From experience, it’s easier to make friends with Indonesians than with Singaporeans who tend to be standoffish on account of their advanced economic development, or with Malaysians who consider themselves the poster boy of Islamic wealth in Asia, or with Thais whose unique ethnic and cultural upbringing sometimes makes it difficult for them to relate to their neighbors.

This ease of friendship often results in Filipinos and Indonesians spending time together after the end of official business activities, seeming to share a love for friendly banter over good food and refreshing drinks.

I experienced what I consider my ultimate test of Indonesian friendship sometime in the late 1990s when then Indonesian President Suharto was ousted from power and mobs of angry youth roamed the business district of Jakarta.

There was an anti-West frenzy at that time. Foreigners were advised by the authorities to stay off the streets and avoid contact with roaming antigovernment protesters.

The hotel in which I was staying asked all non-Indonesian guests to leave and go to the Soekarno-Hatta International Airport to catch flights out of the country.

Arrangements were made for soldiers to escort the hotel vans taking the guests to the airport. For security reasons, the Asian guests did not ride with the Westerners.

Due to the chaos in the streets, some vehicles got cut off from the military escort, and the passengers were left to fend for themselves.

Small youth groups brandishing sticks and machetes banged on the vehicles’ windows, demanding that the passengers show their passports.

Holders of American and European passports were jeered at and, if not for the timely intervention of the hotel security staff on board, would have been dragged out of the vehicles. It was a very scary and dangerous situation.

There were three other Filipinos in the van I rode. When we showed our passports, the youths who accosted us smiled and shouted, “Filipino, Filipino, OK, OK!” They motioned to their companions who were blocking the van to let us through.

The other guests we rode with, whose nationalities I didn’t get to know or even thought of asking because of the tense situation, profusely thanked us, having benefited from the goodwill the Indonesian showed us.

After 30 agonizing minutes, we got to the airport and boarded our flights out of Jakarta. Never had a Philippine passport been so valuable to me than at that time.

Going back to Veloso’s case, the reprieve is a small victory, if not a miracle. We do not know how things will finally play out.

If the leftists and Vice President Jejomar Binay are to be believed, everyone except President Aquino should be given credit for saving Veloso from the gallows for the time being. In my book, the longstanding good relations between Filipinos and Indonesians made a big difference in Widodo’s decision to give Veloso a new lease on life.

Terima kasih (Thank you), Indonesia, for this latest and past favors. We hope we can reciprocate your goodwill in the future. -end-

Commentary:
Raul Palabrica 
Philippine Daily Inquirer


Biyernes, Mayo 1, 2015

Aliping saguiguilid

It’s a crying shame that some of the biggest industries in the Philippines are also the most exploitative of Filipino labor, especially those family-run companies that rake in billions and billions of pesos each year from the retail shopping sector.

With vast fortunes that already ensure that they and their children’s children would live every single day of their pampered lives in luxury, you’d think the captains of these industries would develop some real, honest-to-goodness philanthropy in their hearts that goes beyond throwing crumbs to their favorite charities.

Sad but true that the list of the richest men and women in the Philippines can very well pass off as a list of the most stone-cold hearted people who force their workers to live a hand-to-mouth existence, without job security and while moving like rats from contract to contract every six months.

As we mark Labor Day, let it be said that the contractualization of the Philippine labor force is the worst thing that ever happened in our country; it is far worse than Marcos’ martial law or the five years of Japanese occupation of the Philippines during World War II.

To see one’s youth wasted on temporary jobs bereft of the most basic medical and social security, and jobs that provide starvation pay is far more damaging to the psyche of Filipinos who see the new breed of Hispanic (the Ayalas, and the Zobels) and Chinese (the Sys, Gokongwei’s) illustrados as their slave masters.

Just over a hundred years removed from Jose Rizal, the majority of Filipinos wallowing in abject poverty continues to live as aliping saguiguilid. The only difference now is that the new slaves wear long-sleeves and spit-shined shoes for men and A-cut skirts and blouses and heels for women. -end-