Battered from all sides by a public increasingly
frustrated with its inability to solve the monstrous traffic jams along the
city's major thoroughfares, particularly EDSA, the government appears to be at
wit's end on how to deal with the situation.
It appears that the Cabinet had been deliberating on
the revival of the previous "number-coding" system where vehicles
with license plates ending in odd or even numbers would be banned from the
roads three times a week. This "radical" proposal would have
effectively prevented motorists from using their vehicles three times a week,
in contrast to the current scheme where they are banned from taking to the streets for only a day each
week. With the proposed scheme getting flak from observers in both mainstream
and social media, MalacaƱang has not mentioned it at all in subsequent
pronouncements on the traffic problem.
But that does not mean that the government is simply
letting the present chaotic situation go unresolved.
The Public Works department has indicated the
government is seriously considering the proposal to prohibit vehicles with less
than three passengers from plying EDSA during peak hours, from 7 to 10 in the
morning at 5 to 8 in the afternoon.
However, before this plan can be implemented, the
concerned government agencies should be able to identify and open alternate
routes that can be used by vehicles with less than three passengers.
The problem is that there are obstructions in many
alternative routes, such as parked
vehicles, basketball courts and unfinished flood control projects. Thus, the
proposed 'passenger'-coding scheme has been opposed by vehicle owners who will be
greatly inconvenienced by it.
We must emphasize that vehicle volume reduction should
be just one component of possible short-term solutions to Metro Manila's
traffic mess. The long-term solution, of course, is upgrading and expanding
mass transport based on the light rail system, among others. To impose a
vehicle volume reduction scheme without adequate public consultation and
ensuring viable alternate routes is foolhardy and likely to cost the ruling
party precious votes in an election period. –End-
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento