The Land Transportation Franchising
and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) is at odds with the Metro Manila Development
Authority (MMDA) over the latter’s support for so-called ride-sharing services
like that of Uber and Grab Taxi.
LTFRB’s beef is that MMDA seems to
have forgotten that, among government agencies, the lone authority when it
comes to issuing franchises for public utility vehicles (PUVs) like buses,
jeepneys and taxis rests with LTFRB.
So no matter how MMDA spins Uber’s
and Grab Taxi’s operations that they are akin to carpooling, the reality is
that they are operating for profit and are thus PUVs – PUVs that do not have
the necessary licenses, insurance coverage and drug tests for their drivers.
The issue is not about giving people
the choice to take a regular taxi or to use their smartphones to call Uber or
Grab Taxi. The issue is simply following the law and rules and regulation on
the operation of PUVs.
No veneer of legality from the MMDA
can change the fact that without the requisite permits and licenses and
insurance coverage, the patrons of Uber and Grab Taxi would be without medical
coverage in the event of an accident.
As it is, PUVs with the proper
franchises are already running amuck on our streets: we have killer buses on
the loose, taxis with holdupper drivers and jeepneys that weave in
and out of lanes in utter disregard of everyone’s safety.
The last thing we need is another
set of PUVs masquerading as private ride-sharing scheme. While they offer a
legitimate service, Uber and Grab Taxi should get themselves licensed and
compete with the PUVs on equal terms. -end-
Image by untv
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento